|
Language Policies in Multilingual Countries: Western and Non-Western Approaches |
|
Seminars and Colloquia |
Volodymyr KulykWolfgang MerkelMiloš Vec |
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
“Blame-Games” and “Blame Avoidance” |
|
Seminars and Colloquia |
Markus RheindorfRuth WodakMiloš Vec |
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the world both dramatically and irrevocably. For months, politics and media have focused on COVID-19 and the countless facets of its impact of ever more uncertainty and insecurity in our lives. Following Zygmunt Bauman’s Liquid Fear (2006) and Wodak’s The Politics of Fear (2021), it has become evident that a “politics of fear (and hope)” has been reinforced and instrumentalized by numerous national governments, in significantly different ways. Accordingly, the range of discourses appear to have changed equally dramatically, in terms of both subject matter and discursive practices. Has the pandemic truly altered the strategies and mechanisms of mediatized politics? Which well-understood/well-studied discursive patterns and trends – including interdiscursivity, (re)nationalization, securitization – and which discursive strategies – like the blame-game (Rheindorf & Wodak 2018) and blame avoidance (Hansson 2015) are still to be found in times of COVID-19, perhaps in altered forms? Some may have been marginalized, while the pandemic may have acted as a catalyst for others. Drawing on the Discourse-historical Approach (DHA) in Critical Discourse Studies (CDS), we will raise such questions and attempt to answer them through theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.
Read more
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the world both dramatically and irrevocably. For months, politics and media have focused on COVID-19 and the countless facets of its impact of ever more uncertainty and insecurity in our lives. Following Zygmunt Bauman’s Liquid Fear (2006) and Wodak’s The Politics of Fear (2021), it has become evident that a “politics of fear (and hope)” has been reinforced and instrumentalized by numerous national governments, in significantly different ways. Accordingly, the range of discourses appear to have changed equally dramatically, in terms of both subject matter and discursive practices. Has the pandemic truly altered the strategies and mechanisms of mediatized politics? Which well-understood/well-studied discursive patterns and trends – including interdiscursivity, (re)nationalization, securitization – and which discursive strategies – like the blame-game (Rheindorf & Wodak 2018) and blame avoidance (Hansson 2015) are still to be found in times of COVID-19, perhaps in altered forms? Some may have been marginalized, while the pandemic may have acted as a catalyst for others. Drawing on the Discourse-historical Approach (DHA) in Critical Discourse Studies (CDS), we will raise such questions and attempt to answer them through theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.
Read more
|
|
The Stage of Pre-solidarity |
|
Seminars and Colloquia |
Tomasz RakowskiMiloš Vec |
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
Tomasz Rakowski's experimental study may reveal elements of recent Polish social history omitted in local knowledge-production. He will focus on enthusiastic building, social deeds, vernacular creativity, and various stages of pre-solidarity in Poland since late socialism. He will discuss the flipside of late socialist modernization in Poland, and its trajectory after 1989, considered as both intimate, unrecognized dimensions of bottom-up statehood practices, and processes of acquiring a kind of latent, almost invisible social and political subjectivity. An experimental, historical-ethnographic methodology may unearth elements of Polish social history kept secret for decades. The study is conducted in the context of the “people’s history”, yet more precise, and based on specially elaborated methodology.
Read more
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
Tomasz Rakowski's experimental study may reveal elements of recent Polish social history omitted in local knowledge-production. He will focus on enthusiastic building, social deeds, vernacular creativity, and various stages of pre-solidarity in Poland since late socialism. He will discuss the flipside of late socialist modernization in Poland, and its trajectory after 1989, considered as both intimate, unrecognized dimensions of bottom-up statehood practices, and processes of acquiring a kind of latent, almost invisible social and political subjectivity. An experimental, historical-ethnographic methodology may unearth elements of Polish social history kept secret for decades. The study is conducted in the context of the “people’s history”, yet more precise, and based on specially elaborated methodology.
Read more
|
|
Letters to Enver Hoxha |
|
Seminars and Colloquia |
Nikolai AntoniadisMiloš Vec |
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
In guter Verfassung? |
|
Panels and Discussions |
Miloš Vec Elisabeth Holzleithner, Heinz Fischer, Clemens Jabloner, Christoph Grabenwarter |
|
Speakers: Miloš Vec Elisabeth Holzleithner, Heinz Fischer, Clemens Jabloner, Christoph Grabenwarter
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Speakers: Miloš Vec Elisabeth Holzleithner, Heinz Fischer, Clemens Jabloner, Christoph Grabenwarter
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Junior Fellows’ Conference |
|
Conferences and Workshops |
Aishwary KumarAleksandra GłosAlicja RybkowskaAnastasiya RyabchukEva SchwabHubert CzyzewskiIvan KrastevKrzysztof SkoniecznyLudger HagedornLuiza BialasiewiczMarci ShorePaweł GradSanja DragicZofia SmolarskaMiloš Vec |
|
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
Series: Conferences and Workshops
|
|
Europe and Austria: The Shape of the Future? |
|
Panels and Discussions |
Holly CaseMiloš Vec Erhard Busek |
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|