|
Die Lieblinge der Justiz |
|
Lecture |
Yuri AndrukhovychCornelius Hell |
Lesung und Gespräch mit Juri Andruchowytsch
Series: Lecture
|
Lesung und Gespräch mit Juri Andruchowytsch
Series: Lecture
|
|
In Memory of the “Festival Age” (1987–1994) |
|
Seminars and Colloquia |
Marci ShoreYuri Andrukhovych |
Was it Indeed a Phenomenon?
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Was it Indeed a Phenomenon?
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Capitalism, Alone |
|
Panels and Discussions |
Ivan KrastevShalini RanderiaBranko Milanovic |
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
|
Forced Migration, the Antinomies of Mobility, and the Autonomy of Asylum |
|
Seminars and Colloquia |
Ayşe ÇağlarNicholas de Genova |
Seminar Series on Forced Migration with Nicholas de Genova and Ayse Çağlar
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
Rather than seeing the ever more devious reaction formations of border policing and militarization, migrant detention, immigration enforcement, and deportation by state powers as if these were purely a matter of control, it is instructive to situate this economy of power in relation to the primacy, autonomy, and subjectivity of human mobility on a global (transnational, intercontinental, cross- border, postcolonial) scale. This is true, I contend, as much for refugees as for those who come to be derisively designated to be mere “migrants.” If we start from the human freedom of movement and recognize the various tactics of bordering as reaction formations, then the various tactics of border policing and forms of migration governance can be seen to introduce interruptions that temporarily immobilize and decelerate human cross-border mobilities with the aim of subjecting them to processes of surveillance and adjudication. Indeed, it is this dialectic that reconstitutes these mobilities as something that comes to be apprehensible, alternately, as “migration,” or “asylum-seeking,” or the “forced migration” of “refugees” in flight from persecution or violence – which is to say, as one or another variety of target and object of government. Yet, even under the most restricted circumstances and under considerable constraint, these human mobilities exude a substantial degree of autonomous subjectivity whereby migrants and refugees struggle to appropriate mobility. Even against the considerable forces aligned to immobilize their mobility projects, or to subject them to the stringent and exclusionary rules and constrictions of asylum, the subjective autonomy of human mobility remains an incorrigible force.
Read more
|
Seminar Series on Forced Migration with Nicholas de Genova and Ayse Çağlar
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
Rather than seeing the ever more devious reaction formations of border policing and militarization, migrant detention, immigration enforcement, and deportation by state powers as if these were purely a matter of control, it is instructive to situate this economy of power in relation to the primacy, autonomy, and subjectivity of human mobility on a global (transnational, intercontinental, cross- border, postcolonial) scale. This is true, I contend, as much for refugees as for those who come to be derisively designated to be mere “migrants.” If we start from the human freedom of movement and recognize the various tactics of bordering as reaction formations, then the various tactics of border policing and forms of migration governance can be seen to introduce interruptions that temporarily immobilize and decelerate human cross-border mobilities with the aim of subjecting them to processes of surveillance and adjudication. Indeed, it is this dialectic that reconstitutes these mobilities as something that comes to be apprehensible, alternately, as “migration,” or “asylum-seeking,” or the “forced migration” of “refugees” in flight from persecution or violence – which is to say, as one or another variety of target and object of government. Yet, even under the most restricted circumstances and under considerable constraint, these human mobilities exude a substantial degree of autonomous subjectivity whereby migrants and refugees struggle to appropriate mobility. Even against the considerable forces aligned to immobilize their mobility projects, or to subject them to the stringent and exclusionary rules and constrictions of asylum, the subjective autonomy of human mobility remains an incorrigible force.
Read more
|
|
Borders and Mobility |
|
Lecture |
Ranabir SamaddarNasreen Chowdhory |
with Ranabir Samaddar and Nasreen Chowdhory
Series: Lecture
|
with Ranabir Samaddar and Nasreen Chowdhory
Series: Lecture
|
|
Capitalism on Edge |
|
Lecture |
Albena AzmanovaLudger HagedornWolfgang Merkel |
How Fighting Precarity Can Achieve Radical Change Without Crisis or Utopia
Series: Lecture
|
How Fighting Precarity Can Achieve Radical Change Without Crisis or Utopia
Series: Lecture
|
|
Marginalized (not only) in Times of Lockdown |
|
Seminars and Colloquia |
Alison SmaleLudger HagedornNoémi Kiss |
Culture, Periphery and the East-West-Imbalance
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
In recent months, culture and the arts have suffered severely under pandemic-related restrictions. While artists, freelancers, independent projects, and even publicly funded cultural institutions are struggling for economic survival, we easily overlook the fact that—also in “normal times”—the autonomy of culture is increasingly being called into question. With respect to the immediate effects of this political and economic pressure on the arts, there is a major divide between cultural centers and those operating on the periphery. Most heavily affected by the asymmetric consequences of these pressures are not the trend-setter elites in cultural centers, or the publicly funded (non-)artists on the semi-peripheries, but all those who do not move to the cultural capitals. That is, those who decide to uphold cultural projects on the periphery—where they are most direly needed. Within Europe, there is also a significant East-West divide, not only in terms of the distribution of funding, but also in regard to the autonomy of art. This talk dealt with the situation of cultural actors on the periphery, confronted with emigration, poverty, de-/nationalization, walls, borders, ghettos, diseases, regime changes, and a new intra-European colonization.
Read more
|
Culture, Periphery and the East-West-Imbalance
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
In recent months, culture and the arts have suffered severely under pandemic-related restrictions. While artists, freelancers, independent projects, and even publicly funded cultural institutions are struggling for economic survival, we easily overlook the fact that—also in “normal times”—the autonomy of culture is increasingly being called into question. With respect to the immediate effects of this political and economic pressure on the arts, there is a major divide between cultural centers and those operating on the periphery. Most heavily affected by the asymmetric consequences of these pressures are not the trend-setter elites in cultural centers, or the publicly funded (non-)artists on the semi-peripheries, but all those who do not move to the cultural capitals. That is, those who decide to uphold cultural projects on the periphery—where they are most direly needed. Within Europe, there is also a significant East-West divide, not only in terms of the distribution of funding, but also in regard to the autonomy of art. This talk dealt with the situation of cultural actors on the periphery, confronted with emigration, poverty, de-/nationalization, walls, borders, ghettos, diseases, regime changes, and a new intra-European colonization.
Read more
|
|
“We Are All Refugees”: Informal Settlements and Camps as Converging Spaces of Global Displacements |
|
Seminars and Colloquia |
Ayşe ÇağlarFaranak Miraftab |
Seminar Series on Forced Migration with Faranak Miraftab and Ayse Çağlar
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
Seminar Series on Forced Migration with Faranak Miraftab and Ayse Çağlar
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Crimes Without Punishments and Damaged Collective Identities |
|
Seminars and Colloquia |
Jerko Bakotin |
The Example of the Dvor Massacre
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
The Example of the Dvor Massacre
Series: Seminars and Colloquia
|
|
Die Impfung - Ein knappes Gut? |
|
Panels and Discussions |
Shalini RanderiaKatharina T. Paul, Barbara Prainsack, Ursula Wiedermann-Schmidt |
Europa im Diskurs - Debating Europe
Speakers: Shalini RanderiaKatharina T. Paul, Barbara Prainsack, Ursula Wiedermann-Schmidt
Series: Panels and Discussions
|
Europa im Diskurs - Debating Europe
Speakers: Shalini RanderiaKatharina T. Paul, Barbara Prainsack, Ursula Wiedermann-Schmidt
Series: Panels and Discussions
|